The powerful imagery and emotional component of this phrasing put the political strain Moscow soon realized that it was not merely an engineering structure designed to move oil in the desired direction, but a geopolitical springboard the West had managed to snatch away from Russia.Ģ The term coined by Claus Offe of Germany belongs to the “post-communist transit” paradigm and reflects the dilemma of transition societies: either democracy or a market economy as the absolute priority. During Vladimir Putin’s first term as president, the Kremlin wasted its efforts on joining the “world community” by riding the American “bandwagon of freedom” within the “anti-terrorist consensus.” The West, meanwhile, won the first round: this oil route bypassed Russian territory. The two projects competed in the “dilemma of simultaneity” regime,2 which describes the dy-ġ The project undermined Russia’s position in the Greater Caspian. Ly use to oppose the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) oil pipeline,1 later it armed itself with the South Stream to fight the “gas war.” While at the turn of the 21st century, Russia did not have a trump card it could successful. Russia and the United States are locked in rapidly accelerating rivalry over the Caspian’s gas and gas pipelines (South Stream of Russia vs. In the post-9/11 world, energy resources have become the most coveted trophy, and force has become the main instrument, while national interests are prevailing over the hopes and illusions of the “democratic transit” of the 1990s. Candidate at Ulyanovsk State University (Ulyanovsk, Russian Federation) (Political Science), Professor, Head of the Public Relations Chair, Ulyanovsk State University (Ulyanovsk, Russian Federation) What triggered the race? Never before, even at the height of the Cold War, has the West been so vehemently determined to lower Europe’s dependence on Soviet fuel never before has the Caspian basin attracted the clashing political and economic interests of so many countries.ĬASPIAN ENERGY RESOURCES AND THE “PIPELINE WAR” IN EUROPE IN THE 21ST CENTURY: ENERGY GEOPOLITICS IN NORTHERN EURASIAĭ.Sc. The resultant “diversification race” started the European “pipeline war” of the 21st century. While at the turn of the 21st century, Russia did not have a trump card it could successfully use to oppose the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan ( BTC) oil pipeline, later it armed itself with the South Stream to fight the “gas war.” The two projects competed in the “dilemma of simultaneity” regime, which describes the dynamics of the struggle over several alternatives for the limited resources. Russia and the United States are locked in rapidly accelerating rivalry over the Caspian’s gas and gas pipelines ( South Stream of Russia vs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |